|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
577
   |
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP did not re-run the elections in teh past when other CSM members were removed for TOS/EULA violations, why should they do it now?
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |
Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
577
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP did not re-run the elections in the past when other CSM members were removed for TOS/EULA violations, why exactly should they do it now?
Anyone?
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |
Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
579
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Doc Fury wrote:CCP did not re-run the elections in the past when other CSM members were removed for TOS/EULA violations, why exactly should they do it now? I can't find the name of that candidate now, but if memory serves me right the candidate was not the Chair nor did they hold almost 20% of the vote. That is a large percentage - large enough to make me want a re-election rather than just having an alternate step up. Besides, it is not like running a real-world election so the cost to CCP should be relatively minimal.
So just because one of the members who was removed for TOS/EULA violations got more votes than the other members, that somehow creates the necessity for some kind of a "do-over"?
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |
Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
583
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Doc Fury wrote:So just because one of the members who was removed for TOS/EULA violations got more votes than the other members, that somehow creates the necessity for some kind of a "do-over"? Yes, because it represents such a large slice of the voting population. If 17% of the voting population that put a government in-place has their candidate removed, it seems reasonable to me. These are not normal circumstances. You disagree, no harm. But I would like to see a re-election. We'll probably see the same people re-elected (With maybe Lady Harlot  ) but it would make me feel the new CSM has legitimacy. They're not "sworn in" yet, that happens April 4th.
Yeah, about that.. I don't think that's how a democracy works when an elected "official" is impeached, which is pretty much what happened here. I think CCP provided for alternates for this specific situation.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |
Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
585
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Yeah, about that.. I don't think that's how a democracy works when an elected "official" is impeached, which is pretty much what happened here. I think CCP provided for alternates for this specific situation. It depends on the nature of the democracy and how it is handled. Refer to the previous discussion on a By-Election or read here.
Well, that type of situation would be conditional on there being no alternates, CCP provided for this situation by assigning alternate CSM candidates for *exactly* this situation.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |
Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
585
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 00:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Doddy wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Ai Shun wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Yeah, about that.. I don't think that's how a democracy works when an elected "official" is impeached, which is pretty much what happened here. I think CCP provided for alternates for this specific situation. It depends on the nature of the democracy and how it is handled. Refer to the previous discussion on a By-Election or read here. Well, that type of situation would be conditional on there being no alternates, CCP provided for this situation by assigning alternate CSM candidates for *exactly* this situation. So the current first alternate (i don't even know who it is btw) will represent the people who voted for Mittani? Of course the CFC only have themselves to blame for putting all their votes behind MIttani instead of maximising CSM numbers like in previous years. Oops.
I would imagine that the delegate with the next highest number of votes would become chairman, or the CSM would vote on who becomes chairman from within their ranks.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |
|
|
| |
|